Frank and Angela Haynes wished to place solar panels on their century-old home in Albany, about 20 miles west of St. Cloud.
Frank Haynes labored for an electrical utility years in the past, when most electrical energy was produced by burning coal. He knew that solar is changing into an reasonably priced energy various to scale back fossil gasoline use, which produces greenhouse gasses that contribute to local weather change.
“There actually aren’t many ways in which people can try this, so we felt that it was one thing that we may do,” he stated. “Everybody’s got to do a little something.”
In hindsight, Haynes said he probably should have been a little more cautious when choosing a solar company.
Haynes said he clicked on an online advertisement about solar energy and contacted Brio, a Utah-based solar sales company. A few months later, he signed a contract for a rooftop solar energy system.
It was a frustrating experience, he said, marked by numerous delays and frequent staff turnover that made it difficult to get answers.
Frank Haynes inspects some of the additional equipment that was installed in order to have his solar panels tied into his Albany home’s existing electrical system.
Paul Middlestaedt for MPR News
“From August, we didn’t have a working system until nine months later,” Haynes stated. “And there were huge gaps in there, like months and weeks where we didn’t hear from them at all.”
Last month, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison announced he is suing four Utah-based solar companies: Brio Energy, Bello Solar Energy, Avolta Power and Sunny Solar Utah. The lawsuit also names three company executives.
Ellison said the companies led customers to believe they were affiliated with their local utility. He said they used high-pressure sales tactics to convince customers to sign binding contracts, and threatened legal action if the homeowners tried to cancel.
Assistant attorney general Kirsi Poupore said the companies’ executives instructed sales staff to exaggerate the financial benefits of solar panels, especially to elderly homeowners.
Brio, which has since changed its name to Avolta, didn’t respond to an emailed request for comment.
Some advocates of solar energy say they welcome the lawsuits against unethical companies that put the industry’s reputation at risk.
“Anything that we can do to eliminate bad actors and mitigate harms to consumers is the best thing to do for the long-term success of our industry,” stated Logan O’Grady, government director of the Minnesota Solar Energy Industries Association, a commerce group with 145 members within the solar and energy storage industries.
There are loads of respected corporations doing enterprise in Minnesota, stated Bobby King, state director of Solar United Neighbors, a nonprofit solar buying cooperative. He recommends getting a number of bids and references, and procuring round for financing earlier than selecting an installer.
“I also wouldn’t sign anything until someone’s visited your home, looked it over, and then come back to you with a proposal based on that visit,” King said.
All-Energy Solar, a St. Paul-based solar designer and builder, has been asked to fix some of the faulty systems. CEO Michael Allen said experienced solar companies can provide a precise estimate of how much electricity a system will generate at a given location using weather data.
“We can inform you precisely how a lot solar goes to shine in St. Paul, inside purpose, yr over yr over yr,” he stated.
Solar is an funding a house owner will dwell with for the subsequent 20 to 30 years, Allen stated, so it is necessary to choose an organization that will likely be round for the long run.
“What we’re finding that’s really sad, as we’re fixing a lot of these problems and customers’ issues, is that they don’t even know who they actually ultimately contracted with,” he said.
Another obstacle many home and business owners have encountered is a delay in getting small solar projects connected to the electrical grid.
Earlier this year, Minnesota’s utility regulators told Xcel Energy to work to clear the backlog of projects that have resulted in delays.
There has been some improvement in the wait times since the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission made some adjustments to the approval and connection process, O’Grady said.
Happy with his choice
Frank Haynes had several reasons for installing a solar system on his Albany, Minn. property one of which was to encourage a conversation with his neighbors about renewable energy.
Paul Middlestaedt for MPR News
Despite the setbacks, Haynes said he’s still glad he chose solar energy. The system on the roof of his garage is now producing between 40 to 60 percent of his electricity.
Haynes’ system cost $22,000 after a 26 percent federal tax credit. In eight to ten years, he expects it will pay for itself with savings on his electric bill.
“Our payment for the solar system is less than our average electric bills,” he said. “And at the end of 10 years, we’ll own it, and it’ll still be going for another 15 years.”
The Haynes can preserve tabs on the quantity their solar system is producing through an app on their cellphone.
Paul Middlestaedt for MPR News
Haynes isn’t a part of Ellison’s lawsuit. But he did contact the legal professional common’s workplace to share his expertise, which he stated wasn’t all damaging. Brio paid for injury to his garden that occurred throughout set up, and for his electrical invoice throughout the time the panels weren’t working, he stated.
Haynes stated he most likely paid extra for his solar system than he would have if he’d executed his analysis first. But for him, realizing that the solar panels will likely be producing clear electrical energy for years to return makes that funding worthwhile.
“We would do it again, because we have more motivation than just the money,” he stated.
You make MPR News doable. Individual donations are behind the readability in protection from our reporters throughout the state, tales that join us, and conversations that present views. Help guarantee MPR stays a useful resource that brings Minnesotans collectively.
Donate as we speak. A present of $17 makes a distinction.